Image generated by AI

I recently came across this intriguing quote: ‘Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire.’ As I first read it, I sort of fell in love with it, and it made me reflect on my beliefs and practices of teaching and learning. I searched the internet found that the quote is often attributed to the famous Irish poet and Nobel Prize winner, William Butler Yeats. But I asked myself: what does it really mean? How does it relate to how we teach and learn today?

One aspect of Yeats’ quote involves filling a pail, illustrating passive approaches to learning where teaching is merely seen as depositing knowledge directly into the minds of learners. This approach is characterised by rote memorisation of information, without fostering a deeper understanding or any significant engagement with the subject matter. In this approach, the teacher plays the role of a ‘sage on the stage’ and is often regarded as the knowledge holder who has the full control of the information. Today’s mass lecturing may have been stemmed from this approach.

The second aspect of the quote is lighting a fire, highlighting the active and transformative nature of learning. Instead of teachers trying to directly transfer knowledge into learners’ minds, this approach encourages learners to construct meaning from knowledge. The teacher’s role in this approach is that of a ‘guide on the side’, playing a facilitating role and promoting learner engagement, collaboration, and active participation in the learning process. Learners are encouraged to develop a passion for learning that motivates them to question and discover on their own. The teacher is no longer the sole holder of knowledge, and learners become partners in knowledge creation. Today’s student-centred learning strategies can be examples of this approach.

But what are the implications of these two approaches to teaching and learning? Which teaching approach would be more effective? Should we choose one over the other? In considering an answer, let’s consider the type of knowledge and skills that our students may need to possess as they enter the future workforce. Many qualities and attributes have been identified by experts, including critical thinking, problem-solving, effective communication, creativity, innovation, emotional intelligence, digital and data literacy, and ethical decision-making, among many others. Considering these aspects in our teaching is crucial, because a primary objective of education is to prepare students for success in the fast-changing world of the future, enabling them to thrive and make positive contributions to the world. So, the choice between ‘filling a pail’ and ‘lighting a fire’ is clear for me. It’s the latter, indeed!

So, what teaching approaches do we need to light a fire in our students? It begins with fostering a learning environment that prioritises active engagement and participation. Encouraging students to ask questions, explore their own interests, and connect their learning to real-world applications can foster a sense of curiosity and autonomy. Incorporating interactive and hands-on activities allows students to experience the joy of discovery, making the learning process more meaningful. Moreover, collaborative projects and group discussions not only enhance critical thinking but also promote effective communication and teamwork skills, which are essential in most of today’s work environments. Harnessing technology as a tool for interactive learning, rather than a passive information source, can further improve students’ digital and data literacy. Overall, the goal should be to create an educational experience that not only transfers knowledge from the teacher to students but also establishes mechanisms to spark a flame of intellectual curiosity, inspiring students to become lifelong learners and critical thinkers in a globalised and dynamic world.